Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0p7wXI-0000PYC; Fri, 10 Dec 93 03:20 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 6163; Fri, 10 Dec 93 03:21:04 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 6162; Fri, 10 Dec 1993 03:21:02 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4539; Fri, 10 Dec 1993 02:20:04 +0100 Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1993 20:22:06 EST Reply-To: jorge%PHYAST.PITT.EDU@FINHUTC.hut.fi Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: responses to Jorge on fat gismu X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 561 Lines: 19 la kolin mi spuda di'e > If that is the case, wouldn't a {vecu'u} tag suffice? It doesn't seem to be > crucial to the concept. lojbab seemed to have in mind an attitude, though: > >+++++++ > > think the manner (ie method, form, not so much attitude) is an essential > part of the concept. i le crane pagbu be le ky jufra na mo'u se benji fi mi i mi sruma le du'u le go'i du zoi gy I don't gy i ki'u da mi jinvi le du'u mi srera i zo'ocu'i ma mupli fi le'i ve cpedu co'o mi'e xorxes (to ko mi fraxu doi kolin i mi ti do reroi mrilu ri'a le mi ka juxre toi)