Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 1994 11:00:34 -0500
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 1994 11:00:17 -0500
Message-Id: <199401201600.AA04673@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 2147; Thu, 20 Jan 94 10:58:33 EST
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 3139; Thu, 20 Jan 94 10:58:18 EDT
Date:         Thu, 20 Jan 1994 14:51:32 GMT
Reply-To: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: soc.culture.scientists posting
To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Jan 20 14:51:32 1994
X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET

Lojbab asks:
++++>
 It occurs to me that there has been little discussion of
how we want to test the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis using Lojban in recent
years.  Is there any interest in discussing this on this forum at this
time?
>++++

I have never believed in the possibility of testing Sapir-Whorf experimentally,
and have little interest in attempts to do so.
I observe that discussions of Sapir-Whorf are usually fairly hand-waving about
what the hypothesis at issue actually is. To me a weak form of the hypothesis
(language and culture are crucially interdependent) seems obvious, and a
strong form (language completely conditions the culture or vice versa)
appears unlikely, untestable, and probably unmeaningful.

        Colin