From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Tue Feb 15 09:36:31 1994 Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 1994 14:40:23 -0500 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 1994 14:39:52 -0500 Message-Id: <199402151939.AA03384@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1744; Tue, 15 Feb 94 14:37:59 EST Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 7782; Tue, 15 Feb 94 14:35:47 EDT Date: Tue, 15 Feb 1994 14:36:31 EST Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: Place structures with {co} To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Status: RO X-Status: Something else I just realized: We need a convention for what {vo'a}, {vo'e}, etc. mean when used in a bridi whose selbri is a co-type tanru. I vote for them to refer to the tertanru places only, and not to the unmeritoriously :) promoted places of the seltanru. Also, what are the places of {go'i} and co. when refering to that bridi? I also think they should be only those of the tertanru. mi'e xorxes