Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0pX1xO-0000PjC; Thu, 17 Feb 94 08:11 EET
Message-Id: <m0pX1xO-0000PjC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 1211; Thu, 17 Feb 94 06:32:39 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 1205; Thu, 17 Feb 1994 06:32:38 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9007; Thu, 17 Feb 1994 05:31:45 +0100
Date:         Wed, 16 Feb 1994 19:30:17 GMT
Reply-To:     i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         i.alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK
Subject:      Re: Place structures with {co}
X-To:         c.j.fine@bradford.ac.uk
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 874
Lines: 26

di'e mixre da pe la xorxes. ge'u ce lo terspu be da bei la kolin.
> ++++++>
>  We need a convention for what {vo'a}, {vo'e}, etc. mean when used
> in a bridi whose selbri is a co-type tanru. I vote for them to
> refer to the tertanru places only, and not to the unmeritoriously :)
> promoted places of the seltanru.

> Also, what are the places of {go'i} and co. when refering to that
> bridi? I also think they should be only those of the tertanru.
> >+++++

> I don't agree. As I think is suggested by my argument above, I think these
> gernybasti should take the entire selbri as it stands, and interpret the
> tergismu accordingly.

That was my first instinct, and then I realised I wasn't sure what it meant.
If {da de brodu cei broda co brode di do}, does that mean

bu1=ba1=da
bu2=ba2=de
bu3=be2=di
bu4=be3=do

(with similar effects on VOhA, GOhI, etc.)?

mi'e .i,n.