Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0pWQPM-0000PgC; Tue, 15 Feb 94 16:05 EET
Message-Id: <m0pWQPM-0000PgC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 8368; Tue, 15 Feb 94 16:02:37 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8367; Tue, 15 Feb 1994 16:02:37 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9961; Tue, 15 Feb 1994 15:01:47 +0100
Date:         Tue, 15 Feb 1994 13:12:23 GMT
Reply-To:     i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         i.alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK
Subject:      Re: TECH: Quantifiers (was: cukta)
X-To:         jorge@phyast.pitt.edu
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 757
Lines: 19

la xorxes. di'e cusku
> Since zo'e may represent a sumti not explicitly stated because
> it is obvious from context, I conclude that {ro lo klama} may
> mean "all the goers to the place obvious from context". This is
> very nice, because that's what one often means. (The use of
> {le} is a different matter, I know it will let me get away with
> anything.)

> I don't have to specify what's obvious from context, and
> I don't have to fear that a cooperative listener will interpret
> it as "all goers to anywhwere", even if she is very strict with
> semantics.

> I suspect that my reasoning is wrong, why?

I don't understand your problem - your reasoning looks fine to me.
Just because it's veridical, doesn't mean it has to be precise. %~>

mi'e .i,n.