Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0pW7np-0000PfC; Mon, 14 Feb 94 20:13 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9376; Mon, 14 Feb 94 20:13:35 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 9375; Mon, 14 Feb 1994 20:13:34 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4162; Mon, 14 Feb 1994 19:12:43 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 1994 11:50:45 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: cukta X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: <199402122140.AA19603@nfs1.digex.net> from "Jorge Llambias" at Feb 11, 94 02:49:19 pm Content-Length: 664 Lines: 16 la xorxes. cusku di'e > It is possible to say *anything you want* in lojban, which is not to > say that it's always easy. (Is that too strong a claim? :) It {mabla} better well {ba'e} not be too strong, or we don't have a language: we have a restricted-use code, in principle no more interesting than the international ship-to-ship flag signals. BTW, I support all of your points in this debate, including notably the Lojbab/Nora place structure, and the notion that cfika/prosa/pemci/draci/etc. do the job for the other concept of "book". -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.