Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0pWVby-0000PgC; Tue, 15 Feb 94 21:39 EET
Message-Id: <m0pWVby-0000PgC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 3079; Tue, 15 Feb 94 21:38:23 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 3077; Tue, 15 Feb 1994 21:38:23 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4396; Tue, 15 Feb 1994 20:37:30 +0100
Date:         Tue, 15 Feb 1994 14:36:31 EST
Reply-To:     jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Place structures with {co}
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 407
Lines: 11

Something else I just realized:

We need a convention for what {vo'a}, {vo'e}, etc. mean when used
in a bridi whose selbri is a co-type tanru. I vote for them to
refer to the tertanru places only, and not to the unmeritoriously :)
promoted places of the seltanru.

Also, what are the places of {go'i} and co. when refering to that
bridi? I also think they should be only those of the tertanru.

mi'e xorxes