Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 1994 14:09:10 -0500
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 1994 14:09:02 -0500
Message-Id: <199402111909.AA02182@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 5402; Fri, 11 Feb 94 14:06:06 EST
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 1227; Fri, 11 Feb 94 14:07:39 EDT
Date:         Fri, 11 Feb 1994 19:05:43 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: cukta
X-To:         lojban@cuvma.BITNET
To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
In-Reply-To:  (Your message of Thu, 10 Feb 94 15:49:04 EST.)
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-From-Space-Date: Fri Feb 11 19:05:43 1994
X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET

Jorge writes:
> Bob and And propose to keep the definition essentially as it is,
> with a slight change of words.
>
> And's version of Bob Chassell's definition:

I have not been participating in this discussion, yet Jorge keeps
on attributing remarks to me. Are there two Ands? Is someone
masquerading as me? Could there be a confusion between 'And'
and 'Art'?
-------
And (the real one)