Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0pWAnl-0000PeC; Mon, 14 Feb 94 23:25 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1752; Mon, 14 Feb 94 23:23:50 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 1750; Mon, 14 Feb 1994 23:23:50 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0326; Mon, 14 Feb 1994 22:22:59 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 1994 16:23:56 EST Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: Place structures with {co} X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 693 Lines: 30 > la xorxes. cusku di'e la djan cusku di'e > The places of a tanru are those of the rightmost brivla, without exception. > This is not necessarily the logical tertanru. Not all the places, only the ones after the tanru. The places that appear before the tanru are still those of the {tertanru} aren't they? So da de {broda co brode} is different from da {broda co brode} de and also from {broda co brode} fa da de This doesn't happen with any other type of tanru. And I insist that any place of broda (the tertanru) that has not been filled before the {co}, becomes inaccessible. (BTW, what's the logical tertanru, as opposed to the plain tertanru?) Jorge