Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 17:00:51 -0500 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 17:00:29 -0500 Message-Id: <199402232200.AA05447@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4438; Wed, 23 Feb 94 16:58:59 EST Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 2449; Wed, 23 Feb 94 16:59:18 EDT Date: Wed, 23 Feb 1994 16:58:23 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: TECH: Quantifiers (was: cukta) X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: <199402172025.AA04679@nfs2.digex.net> from "i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk" at Feb 17, 94 06:30:15 pm Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Wed Feb 23 21:58:23 1994 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET mi pu cusku di'e > > It does and it doesn't, because in the context "da poi ... da" the second > > use of "da" has been restricted by the "poi". So "poi" really sets a > > domain, rather than selecting a subset. "ro da poi" = "all-of those-things > > in-domain". la .i,n. cusku di'e > I'm not sure I understand the distinction you're making between setting > a domain and selecting a subset - "all-of those-things in-domain" is > a subset of "all-of those-things". Saying "re le nanmu" selects a subset, in fact a 2-set, of the men-I-have-in- mind, but "le nanmu" thereafter does not carry the selection with it. The use of "poi", however, does not merely select a subset, but sets up a pervasive restriction on the meaning of the sumti so restricted. -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.