Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0pg0ZA-0000R2C; Mon, 14 Mar 94 02:31 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4056; Mon, 14 Mar 94 02:31:19 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 4054; Mon, 14 Mar 1994 02:31:19 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9565; Mon, 14 Mar 1994 01:30:17 +0100 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 1994 19:32:17 EST Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: The Mad Proposals X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 2677 Lines: 87 Here's an assessment of the amount of work that the changes would require, considering the grammar papers, the lessons and the text in the ftp site. The only significant work would be in the rewriting of the connectives paper. I) For lojban text. This is based on the approx 260 kilobytes of text from the ftp archive. Change: To: Number of appearances: gi'a gija 4 gi'e gije 235 gi'i giji 0 gi'o gijo 2 gi'u giju 3 gu'a...gi jagu...gu 0 gu'e...gi jegu...gu 0 gu'i...gi jigu...gu 0 gu'o...gi jogu...gu 1 gu'u...gi jugu...gu 0 ga jagi 2 ge jegi 17 ge'i jigi 0 go jogi 4 gu jugi 1 je'i ji 1 ji ku ji 0 Total number of changes: 270, or approximately one per kilobyte. (Many of the files contain English translations as well, so probably two per kilobyte is closer. It's mostly a mechanical change anyway) I don't know how much is the total amount of text in existence, but updating it to these changes should be very easy. II) The lessons. GAs, GUhAs, GIhAs and {ji} are never mentioned in the lessons, although {gi'e} is used five times in the Lojban version of section titles. {je'i} is used in lessson02 to show the difference in pronunciation between {je}, {jei} and {je'i}. Thus, the only change the lessons would require is in five titles. III) The grammar papers (other than the connectives paper). GUhAs: appear in a paragraph in the "plgs" paper GAs: a paragraph in the "mex" paper a paragraph in the "negation" paper an example in the "places" paper GIhAs: mentioned in "places", "pro", "sumti" and "tense" papers ji: one example in "plgs" paper je'i: one example in "tense" paper In addition, all the question connectives are treated in "text", so that paragraph would need modification. A few more changes than in the lessons, but it can probably be done in a couple of hours. IV) The connectives paper. Many sections would have to be rewritten, but mostly to simplify it. I think this is the only real work that would be required. I don't know if there is any other documentation that would require changes, I don't think the brochure and introductory texts go into enough detail to mention GAs, GIhAs and GUhAs, but in any case, it's easy to change if they do. I don't think that the amount of work would be such a big problem, but maybe I'm misssing some part. Jorge