From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU Wed Apr 13 04:41:54 1994
Message-Id: <199404130841.AA22116@nfs1.digex.net>
Date: Wed Apr 13 04:41:54 1994
Reply-To: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@bradford.ac.uk>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@bradford.ac.uk>
Subject:      Re: Once again...
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
Status: RO

Jorge:
++++>
 Again, I believe MOIs don't do MEXs.

I like {za'upamoi nu mi tcidu}, but if we want to get picky, the claim
is not exactly the same, because I'm not claiming that I'm reading, but
rather that something is an event of my reading.
>++++++

Sorry, wasn't thinking.
Does za'upa mean 'one more'? I would have taken it to mean
'more than one', parallel with su'opa. We really do need the
grammar of generalised PA to be tied down We talked about it
at Bradford Lojfest, but not very conclusively).

I agree that if you want to be picky they are different, but I am always
pleased when somebody uses a na'o lojbo pe'i expression like
observative NU.

Interesting question:

xu ro bu'a zo'u go bu'a gi nu bu'a

If so then the truth values are the same and the difference
is purely pragmatic.

        Colin