Message-Id: <m0q6nLC-00005JC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Date:         Thu, 26 May 1994 04:26:14 -0400
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: Cmavo conflict:  "vu'o"
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 1105
Lines: 23

I did some checking, and I am guessing that "vu'o" is what you chose for
XUhO in Change 34.  Change 34 and 35 have not yet been approved, and indeed
you had never posted a specific cmavo selection for Change 34.

(I don't see any reason why they WON'T be approved; but we never called
the question, and I haven't even shown either to Nora, much less talked
to pc.)

On the other hand, my copy of the cmavo list does have the contour vu'o
in it, and hence it should be the one to stand, and in addition, I oughta
get my list put up on the ftp site and sent to Jorge so he can diff it
and apply changes as necessary to the work that he is doing.

If I am correct in my understanding of this 2nd vu'o, then choose a word
and give me a cmavo list line for it, before I upload my file.  (bu'o
seems fine to me, though there really is no reason to insist on
consistency in the vowels since the previous assignment was never promulgated).

I hope that assuming that Changes 34 and 35 are approved, that they will
make it into the papers as appropriate; your posting implies that at least
one hasn't yet.

lojbab