Message-Id: <199405262205.AA05700@nfs1.digex.net>
Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Date: Thu May 26 18:05:32 1994
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Cmavo conflict:  "vu'o"
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Thu May 26 18:05:32 1994
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU

> Since the second "vu'o" involves a grammar change as well as a cmavo-list
> change, it makes most sense to change the first.  A logical candidate is
> "bu'o", which is free and is very similar in form.

I remembered only the first {vu'o}, but I don't really care if it gets
renamed.

Does {re'u} stand any chance of being accepted as the ordinal ROI?

Jorge