From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU Thu May  5 18:12:37 1994
Message-Id: <199405052212.AA23408@nfs1.digex.net>
Date: Thu May 5 18:12:37 1994
Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: afterthought logical connection
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
Status: RO

> Jorge complains:
> +++++>
> > > (I'm not
> > > sure what kanxyjvavlina means, why not just the te vlina?)
> Or was it meant to be kanxyjavyvlina?
> >++++

Colin clarifies:

> Yes, it was meant to be that. I was generalising the discussion beyond
> nunkanxe, and we haven't got an agreed term for 'logical connective'
> or its terbri. (I tried lojyjonma'o once, but I don't think it's very
> perspicuous). So I coined one on the spot.

Why not? Maybe {logji jonma'o}, so that {jonma'o} is the general term
for connective. {te jonma'o} and {ve jonma'o} would be the connectees.

(jonma'o reminds me of your Prime Minister's name, maybe it can serve
as a mnemonic.)

Jorge