Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qEgVE-00001WC; Fri, 17 Jun 94 19:10 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0qEgVE-00001WC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 1993; Fri, 17 Jun 94 19:11:05 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 1991; Fri, 17 Jun 1994 19:11:05 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5036; Fri, 17 Jun 1994 18:09:14 +0200
Date:         Fri, 17 Jun 1994 12:09:24 EDT
Reply-To:     jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: {kau} and {du'u} and {jei}
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Content-Length: 642
Lines: 28

>From Colin:

> I just sent a mail to you only by mistake - please forward it to the list.
>       ki'e mi'e kolin


>
> Jorge asks:
> >kanxe    x1 is a conjunction, stating that x2 (du'u) and
>          x3 (du'u) are both true
>
> >(This makes me ask, what type of place is x1? Is it text=(sedu'u)?)
>
> Certainly not! A conjunction doesn't have to be expressed. It is a du'u.
> Don't be misled by the word 'stating'.
>
> In the terms of my last mail,
> kanxe +abstract, +proposition
> se kanxe      +abstract, +proposition
> te kanxe      +abstract, +proposition
>
>       Colin
>


(I didn't yet get the last mail mentioned there.)

Jorge