Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qIU4m-00001zC; Tue, 28 Jun 94 06:43 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0qIU4m-00001zC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 1251; Tue, 28 Jun 94 06:43:20 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 1247; Tue, 28 Jun 1994 06:43:19 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2584; Tue, 28 Jun 1994 05:41:21 +0200
Date:         Mon, 27 Jun 1994 23:41:23 -0400
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: Problem with cnima'o scales
X-To:         C.J.Fine@bradford.ac.uk
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 206
Lines: 7

On one of these attitudinals, the word chosen may be the problem:
.e'inai "challenge" was meant to be interpreted as "challenge/resistance to
constraint".

I'll have to look at the others off-line.

lojbab