Date: Mon, 11 Jul 1994 00:39:25 -0400 From: Logical Language Group Message-Id: <199407110439.AA29156@access1.digex.net> To: nsn@vis.mu.oz.au Subject: Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'. (fwd) Cc: lojbab@access.digex.net, lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Mon Jul 11 00:40:00 1994 X-From-Space-Address: lojbab NN> (I have to bite my tongue to stop from saying "majQa'!" There isn't a NN> Lojban attitudinal corresponding to this exclamation (= "Well done")). Whaddaya mean, there isn't? We can do ANYTHING with attitudinals %^) How about .i'ecai for the general meaning, and .uo.i'ecai .uo.io.i'ecai, etc. for various flavors that might be appropriate to completing a thesis (oh, and .u'a could go in there somewhere too.) NN> zandjine'u did seem odd to me. As you'll have notice, I said just zanru to NN> Iain. I think do zanru fi mi will do fine. I did a double-ake on "do zanru" the first time, thinking you must have meant "do se zanru". But now I am really confused since zanru has no x3 place. "zabna" perhaps??? Or something else? lojbab