Message-Id: <199407062358.AA00374@nfs1.digex.net>
Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Date: Wed Jul  6 19:58:53 1994
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Problem perhaps
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Jul  6 19:58:53 1994
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU

> Nora feels that we should have an operator in LAhE, to go along with
> lu'a/lu'i/lu'o cinverters, which would exlicitly treat the sumti inside as
> distributed indivduals.  I could accept this argument if there is agreement.

Can't {lu'a} do this job?

        mi spuda lu'a ro notci bau le ri bangu

It already has to identify what it acts upon as a mass or a set, why not let
it act also on individuals to clearly distribute them?

Jorge