Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qOXO7-000022C; Thu, 14 Jul 94 23:28 EET DST Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8783; Thu, 14 Jul 94 23:26:44 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8782; Thu, 14 Jul 1994 23:26:43 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4137; Thu, 14 Jul 1994 22:25:54 +0200 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 1994 16:29:18 EDT Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: cukta X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 951 Lines: 33 la lojbab cusku di'e > JL> x1 is a copy/manifestation of some work or collection of works x2 in some > JL> medium x3. > JL> > JL> But that's not what the gismu list says. > The gismu list ois not incompatible with that definition I have in the gismu list: cukta cku book x1 is a book about subject/theme/story x2 by author x3 for audience x4 preserved in medium x5 1f 163 [this is a quantity of text, and not the physical object (= selpapri); x2 may be a convention rather than a subject]; (cf. cfika, prina, prosa, tcidu, papri) > "pride and Prejudice" is a "se cukta" or a "lu'e le cukta" Great! Then the definition in the list I have is old? > You can carry a cukta, write a selcukta, but writing in a cukta will > normally deface it, unless it is the original of your selcukta That's fine. Sorry if I was complaining without reason. It seemed from your answer to Nick that you hadn't made the change. > > lojbab > Jorge