Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qSuqC-000023C; Wed, 27 Jul 94 01:19 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0qSuqC-000023C@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 5322; Wed, 27 Jul 94 01:17:56 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 5318; Wed, 27 Jul 1994 01:17:56 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0395; Wed, 27 Jul 1994 00:17:03 +0200
Date:         Tue, 26 Jul 1994 18:20:09 EDT
Reply-To:     jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me"
X-To:         holmes@diamond.idbsu.edu, lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 375
Lines: 8

I don't know how "le" works in Loglan, but in Lojban its default
quantifier is "ro" = "all". Then {lu'i le nanmu} means the same
thing as {lu'i ro le nanmu} and cannot be a set with a single man
as an element if {le nanmu} refers to three men. It means "the set
of all the men I have in mind". I hope John Cowan is reading and
will correct me if I'm talking nonsense.

Jorge