From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU Sun Jul 10 07:46:35 1994
Message-Id: <199407101146.AA05233@nfs1.digex.net>
Date: Sun Jul 10 07:46:35 1994
Reply-To: Nick NICHOLAS <nsn@vis.mu.oz.au>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Nick NICHOLAS <nsn@vis.mu.oz.au>
Subject:      Re: Problem perhaps
X-To:         i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
X-Cc:         Lojban Mailing List <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
In-Reply-To:  <199407061719.695@krang.vis.mu.OZ.AU> from
              "i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk" at Jul 6, 94 06:09:25 pm
Status: RO

Hu'tegh! nuq ja' i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk jay'?

=I think we agreed that {no'a} could refer back to the "enclosing" selbri
=in cases like this (not just a bridi as the 6/94 cmavo list says),
=which would give you {le kansa be le leno'a speni}.

.i fau leda'i nu ma'a na'eca'a tugni lenu zo no'a ka'e se pilno la'edi'u keikei
ma'a .e'u tugni ledei nu se pilno

(We still have no good anaphoric device for something massively embedded like
{lenu zo no'a ka'e se pilno}. Don't think we'll get one in a hurry either.

=la temci cu se pilno la rarna le nu fanta le nu co'ida rode fasnu

.i mi pu na jundi le la .i,n. ta'e notci fanmo se cusku .i ri jai se certu
.i do zanru

co'omi'e nitcion.