Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qRYpQ-000023C; Sat, 23 Jul 94 07:36 EET DST Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 5989; Sat, 23 Jul 94 07:35:25 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 5986; Sat, 23 Jul 1994 07:35:25 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9199; Sat, 23 Jul 1994 06:34:35 +0200 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 1994 00:35:50 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai X-To: nsn@vis.mu.oz.au X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 733 Lines: 14 tu'a HAS taken hold in the speech community, such as it exists. *YOU* certainly used it liberally in our US-to-oz nunfonta'a last weekend (No I don't expect you to come up with a verbatim transcript like you did the previous time we talked %^), and we had no trouble understanding. What is needed is for people to better realize WHEN they are raising, and we seem to be constantly improving in that self-monitoring. Yes, the IRC conversation was fully logged, and I hope to have a transcript for you to comment on soon, whereupon it will be posted (and everyone can see how much more prolific you are in Esperanto than in Lojban %^) - or maybe I should drop that part? %^) At least you didn't add in much Klingon too %^) lojbab