Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qSo1T-000023C; Tue, 26 Jul 94 18:02 EET DST Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9812; Tue, 26 Jul 94 18:01:06 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 9807; Tue, 26 Jul 1994 18:01:05 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3134; Tue, 26 Jul 1994 17:00:09 +0200 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 1994 11:01:33 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: <199407260430.AA10169@access1.digex.net> from "Logical Language Group" at Jul 26, 94 00:30:40 am Content-Length: 495 Lines: 16 mi pu cusku di'e > LL> la lojbab. ga'inai malpensi doi ga'icu'i > LL> Lojbab, that scumbag, is a poor-quality thinker, O-my-equal. la lojbab. cusku di'e > Am I missing something here? In one case ga'inai results in "my superior" > while in the other it results in "that scumbag". This doesn't exactly seem > consistent. Lose the "nai" in this example. -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.