Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qVb4P-000023C; Wed, 3 Aug 94 10:49 EET DST Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1380; Wed, 03 Aug 94 10:47:32 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 1375; Wed, 3 Aug 1994 10:47:31 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6233; Wed, 3 Aug 1994 09:46:35 +0200 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 1994 12:40:33 +0800 Reply-To: Doug Landauer Sender: Lojban list From: Doug Landauer Subject: Re: The Fifty United States, etc. X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 1098 Lines: 24 > Well, here's my detailed critique. > > california kalifornias > kelifornias. (BG) > > sacramento sakramentos > sekrymentos. (BG modified) > > san francisco sanfransiskos > senfrensiskos. (BG) > sanfransiskos. (Spanish) > > los angeles losANdzylys [spanish: losANxeles] > losENdjylys. > my can't-define-it-but-I-know-it-when-I-see-it criteria for "major" Well, as it is one of the top 10 or 11 cities in the COUNTRY by population, I don't think you can get away with omitting San Diego. And as San Jose is larger than San Francisco, it really ought to be there too ... Here are my suggestions... San Diego sendiegos San Jose senxoses (Spanish) San Jose senxozes ('Murrican) -- Doug Landauer -- landauer@eng.sun.com _ Sun Microsystems, Inc. -- SMI/SunSoft/DevPro/ADE La no ka 'oi.