Date: Fri, 5 Aug 1994 13:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Glenn M. Forrest" <gmf@seattleu.edu>
Subject: Re: Lojbanizing place names
To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
In-Reply-To: <9408051709.AA19251@bach.seattleu.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.07.9408051309.B1140-a100000@bach>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 921
Lines: 28


On Fri, 5 Aug 1994, Veijo Vilva wrote:

> la'o .ibu Roberto Ricci .ibu cusku di'e
> 
> > Date:         Fri, 5 Aug 1994 17:22:50 +0200
> > From:         rricci@VXCERN.CERN.CH
> > Subject:      Lojbanizing place names
> 
> [...]
> 
>   There is the cmavo {la'o} which indicates a quoted non-Lojban name
>   Quotes can be any Lojban word which is not contained in the quote,
>   like at the top of this reply. Often the Lojban initial letteral
>   of the name of the source language is used, like {.ibu} for Italian
>   or {sy} for Finnish ( < Suomi in Finnish).
> 
>   There are 2 sets of 5 assignable pro-sumti (ko'a, ko'e, ..., ko'u and fo'a,
>   fo'e, ..., fo'u. These sets can be arbitrarily expanded using subscripts).
> 
>   The mechanism is there to use.
______________________________________

I think that the question posed by Roberto is a valid one.  If the
mechanism is there then why isn't it being used?