From cognica!monp@comback.login.qc.ca Tue Aug 23 08:21:10 1994
Received: from comback.login.qc.ca by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA01372
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@access.digex.net>); Tue, 23 Aug 1994 08:21:06 -0400
Received: from cognica.UUCP (cognica@localhost) by comback.login.qc.ca (8.6.5/8.6.5) with UUCP id IAA10090 for lojbab@access.digex.net; Tue, 23 Aug 1994 08:03:38 -0400
Message-Id: <199408231203.IAA10090@comback.login.qc.ca>
Received: from cogni-case/monp by cognicase.ca
          (PMail+UDG PegWaf v0.31 93.10.18) id 1279 for lojbab@access.digex.net;
          Fri, 19 Aug 1994 17:41:22 EST 5 EDT
To: lojbab@access.digex.net
From: MONP@cognicase.ca (Patrice Mongeau)
Date:         Fri, 19 Aug 1994 17:41:21 
Subject:      
Priority: normal
X-Mailer:     WinPMail v1.0 (R2)
Organization: Cogni-CASE inc.
Status: RO

I read was I just received from you with great interest.  Lojban seems 
to be more or less what I myself wanted to create once.  Someone 
said to me at that time that a predicate-based language wouldn't be 
welcomed by most people.  This happened in 1981.  I then learnt 
Esperanto.

I would like to share some comments before learning Lojban.  Your 
name suggests that it could happen in French, couldn't it? Let me 
know.

Someone who knows Lojban enought to speak it and knows also 
Esperanto would also be a valueable partner to speak with for me.  Of 
course, I want to discuss about linguistic aspects, learnableness, 
usefulness, joyproviderness and otherness of lojban.
Patrice Mongeau
Cogni-CASE
monp@cognicase.ca