From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Sat Aug 20 02:59:43 1994
Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA18318
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>); Sat, 20 Aug 1994 02:59:39 -0400
Message-Id: <199408200659.AA18318@nfs1.digex.net>
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 2198; Sat, 20 Aug 94 03:01:07 EDT
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4916; Sat, 20 Aug 1994 03:01:04 -0400
Date:         Fri, 19 Aug 1994 23:59:01 -0700
Reply-To: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
Subject:      Nested PP rel-clauses
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Status: RO

        I want to say I am very much for it.  Anything that makes the
language more natural for a very large group of potential speakers is
worth the time and effort; provided it doesn't introduce new problems.
Whether lojban remains a laboratory curiosity or spreads around the
world like English did will depend on things like this. Different
grammatical styles of lojban can easily coexist. There is no reason why
one has to be "correct".  Thanks, Viejo.
djer  jlk@netcom.com