Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qYMbf-00004sC; Thu, 11 Aug 94 01:58 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0qYMbf-00004sC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 6006; Thu, 11 Aug 94 01:57:22 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 6002; Thu, 11 Aug 1994 01:57:22 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4138; Thu, 11 Aug 1994 00:56:24 +0200
Date:         Wed, 10 Aug 1994 23:57:23 +0100
Reply-To:     ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: And's latest le'avla (was: Lojbanizing umlaut)
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
In-Reply-To:  (Your message of Tue, 09 Aug 94 14:01:05 D.)
Content-Length: 362
Lines: 12

lo djani cu cusku dihe:
> la'o gy. And Rosta .gy. cusku di'e
>
> > coho, mihe le rosta
>
> Won't work, as le'avla aren't allowed to be of gismu form.  I suggest
> "le .androsta", which is a valid type 4 le'avla.

I thought it was an unassigned gismu, and as such grammatical but
semantically (though obviously not pragmatically) vacuous.

coho, mihe la xrugopif