Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qb2iM-00004xC; Thu, 18 Aug 94 11:20 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0qb2iM-00004xC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 5626; Thu, 18 Aug 94 11:19:23 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 5622; Thu, 18 Aug 1994 11:19:22 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8546; Thu, 18 Aug 1994 10:18:19 +0200
Date:         Thu, 18 Aug 1994 09:20:51 BST
Reply-To:     i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         i.alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK
Subject:      Re: xruti
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 306
Lines: 7

I am mildly in favour of the change to an agentless {xruti},
if mainly because it's going to get used that way anyway,
for the same sort of reasons that we still have people who
ought to know better by now using e.g. {slabu} to mean
"advanced in years", or {darlu} to mean "quarrel".  :-)

co'o mi'e .i,n.