Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qZvtz-00004uC; Mon, 15 Aug 94 09:52 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0qZvtz-00004uC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 4126; Mon, 15 Aug 94 09:50:52 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 4124; Mon, 15 Aug 1994 09:50:52 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8799; Mon, 15 Aug 1994 08:49:54 +0200
Date:         Mon, 15 Aug 1994 02:51:50 -0400
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: xruti
X-To:         jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu, nsn@krang.vis.mu.oz.au
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 292
Lines: 8

I thin krefu handles most agentless usages, but I concede that our move away
from agentive prediucates when there is a good reason argues for a change.
This requires approval of Nick, who is doing lujvo, as well as no objection
from the rest of the community.

Nick.  Please respond!

lojbab