From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Sat Sep 17 12:38:56 1994
Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA15611
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>); Sat, 17 Sep 1994 12:38:53 -0400
Message-Id: <199409171638.AA15611@nfs1.digex.net>
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 1636; Sat, 17 Sep 94 12:40:58 EDT
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2262; Sat, 17 Sep 1994 12:40:58 -0400
Date:         Sat, 17 Sep 1994 12:40:38 EDT
Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      unicorns
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Status: RO

On a different subject altogether.

> OK.  This now looks somewhat familiar.  "lo iunikorno does NOT claim that

{lo iunikorno} splits into {lo .iu ni korno} = "some [love!] amount of korno"
and besides why the initial "iu"?  I think it's {lo pavyseljirna}.

Just defending the purity of the language :)

Jorge