Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qnTn3-00005XC; Wed, 21 Sep 94 18:41 EET DST Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 2727; Wed, 21 Sep 94 18:39:33 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2722; Wed, 21 Sep 1994 18:39:31 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8664; Wed, 21 Sep 1994 17:38:14 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 1994 09:26:06 -0600 Reply-To: Randall Holmes Sender: Lojban list From: Randall Holmes Subject: Analogy X-To: lojban%cuvmb.bitnet@idbsu.idbsu.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 576 Lines: 9 The relation between resolving meanings of multiple appearances of logically connected arguments and implicit quantification is not precisely one of analogy; the first is seen to be a special case of the second on ananlysis, and so it would be better if they were handled in the same way. Jorge remarks that he is not so certain that there really is an offical line on how to resolve this kind of situation; I suspect in TLI Loglan the solution is the one that I suggest (as soon as someone asks me about it). --Randall Holmes