Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qkR9q-00005JC; Tue, 13 Sep 94 09:15 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0qkR9q-00005JC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 3416; Tue, 13 Sep 94 09:14:24 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 3414; Tue, 13 Sep 1994 09:12:23 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7775; Mon, 12 Sep 1994 19:14:54 +0200
Date:         Mon, 12 Sep 1994 18:16:53 BST
Reply-To:     i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         i.alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK
Subject:      Re: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 312
Lines: 10

la kris. bogart. cusku di'e
> > 9)      "do djica tu'a loi ckafi ji loi tcati lu'u"

la djan. kau,n. spusku di'e
> This, I think (and so does Jorge, I believe) is the right general solution.

As do I, in case you've forgotten.
It certainly applies to {djica} .ia and probably to some others as well.

mi'e .i,n.