Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qm2nN-00005LC; Sat, 17 Sep 94 19:39 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0qm2nN-00005LC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 5559; Sat, 17 Sep 94 19:37:59 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 5555; Sat, 17 Sep 1994 19:37:58 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1546; Sat, 17 Sep 1994 18:36:47 +0200
Date:         Sat, 17 Sep 1994 12:40:38 EDT
Reply-To:     jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      unicorns
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 311
Lines: 10

On a different subject altogether.

> OK.  This now looks somewhat familiar.  "lo iunikorno does NOT claim that

{lo iunikorno} splits into {lo .iu ni korno} = "some [love!] amount of korno"
and besides why the initial "iu"?  I think it's {lo pavyseljirna}.

Just defending the purity of the language :)

Jorge