Received: from access4.digex.net by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA28182
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@nfs1.digex.net>); Thu, 22 Sep 1994 01:10:18 -0400
Received: by access4.digex.net id AA10247
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for lojbab); Thu, 22 Sep 1994 01:11:53 -0400
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 01:11:53 -0400
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
Message-Id: <199409220511.AA10247@access4.digex.net>
To: pcliffje@crl.com
Subject: Re: silence?
Cc: lojbab@access.digex.net
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Sep 22 01:10:22 1994
X-From-Space-Address: lojbab

OK.  I can live with that.  If you know the 'official position', and we do
not need to make any changes, then I am satisfied till you get to summarize.
This thread should start to peter out any time now, since I have shut up,
and Cowan is saying little.

my only concern is with 
>The right of "any" is raised sumti from an event abstract, of course.  

This seems to imply that any (ugh!) sumti which can use the place value 
"any broda" inherently needs to be an abstract sumti, which therefore
means that all sumti are potentially raised  (since I think all concrete 
sumti are meaningful with some kind of "any" value).  Am I misunderstanding,
.a'o ?

lojbab