Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0qvTFv-00004yC; Thu, 13 Oct 94 18:43 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8063; Thu, 13 Oct 94 18:44:02 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8062; Thu, 13 Oct 1994 18:44:00 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7782; Thu, 13 Oct 1994 17:40:47 +0100 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 1994 12:02:00 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: TECH: brivla sets with the same sumti X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: <199410122307.AA05383@nfs1.digex.net> from "ucleaar" at Oct 12, 94 09:39:34 pm Content-Length: 621 Lines: 17 la .and. cusku di'e > What is the simplest way to render into Lojban "Jack loves and admires > Jill", i.e. "X Y broda .i X Y brode"? (Not "Jack loves-cum-admires Jill" > - this is not what I mean, though if you wish to remind me of how that > is done, please do.) Well, if for ".i" we read ".ije", logical conjunction, the correct form is: la djek. broda gi'e brode vau la djil. where the "vau" forces the parallel VPs to a close, leaving "la djil." outside the scope of the conjunction. -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.