Received: from access2.digex.net by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA10571 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for ); Tue, 11 Oct 1994 10:38:42 -0400 Received: by access2.digex.net id AA28203 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for lojbab); Tue, 11 Oct 1994 10:38:25 -0400 From: Logical Language Group Message-Id: <199410111438.AA28203@access2.digex.net> Subject: Re: Types of quantification To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 10:38:24 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojbab@access.digex.net (Logical Language Group) In-Reply-To: <199410101649.AA19009@nfs1.digex.net> from "Veijo Vilva" at Oct 10, 94 05:48:13 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1649 Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Tue Oct 11 10:38:45 1994 X-From-Space-Address: lojbab la veion. cusku di'e > One reason to differentiate between {vo da poi} and {vo [lo]} > is that > > [1] le kanba cu se tuple vo da > > says that 'the goat has four legs, no less, no more' (according > to the discussion a couple of years back). If {vo [lo]} would > equal {vo da poi}, it would be impossible to say > > [2] mi citka vo plise > > without claiming that during all my life I eat exactly 4 apples > (if truth values are to be determined over all eternity as Jorge > maintains). I believe this to be a confusion. The no-less-no-more interpretation of both Example 1 and Example 2 stands. However, neither one gives a tense indication, which means that the statements hold as of some specific, but unstated, time, as if by "ca zo'e". Now the leggedness of a specific goat tends to be independent of time, unless it has an amputation or some such, so the question of time can be ignored in Example 1. In Example 2, however, time is of the essence, since eating (unlike having legs) is inherently time-bound. Jorge's "timeless" interpretations of sentences, meaning that they may be true of the past or the future or whatever, does not extend to implying that a sentence without tense markers is true during all eternity! In fact, there is now the explicit tense marker "caze'e" meaning "true throughout eternity" to do that job when needed. So uttering Example 2 means that at some time or other, during some interval or other, which the listener is intended to infer from context, you ate exactly four apples. -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.