Received: from access1.digex.net by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA09762 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for ); Thu, 13 Oct 1994 12:02:07 -0400 Received: by access1.digex.net id AA15703 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for lojbab); Thu, 13 Oct 1994 12:02:00 -0400 From: Logical Language Group Message-Id: <199410131602.AA15703@access1.digex.net> Subject: Re: TECH: brivla sets with the same sumti To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Date: Thu, 13 Oct 1994 12:02:00 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojbab@access.digex.net (Logical Language Group) In-Reply-To: <199410122307.AA05383@nfs1.digex.net> from "ucleaar" at Oct 12, 94 09:39:34 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 589 Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Thu Oct 13 12:02:11 1994 X-From-Space-Address: lojbab la .and. cusku di'e > What is the simplest way to render into Lojban "Jack loves and admires > Jill", i.e. "X Y broda .i X Y brode"? (Not "Jack loves-cum-admires Jill" > - this is not what I mean, though if you wish to remind me of how that > is done, please do.) Well, if for ".i" we read ".ije", logical conjunction, the correct form is: la djek. broda gi'e brode vau la djil. where the "vau" forces the parallel VPs to a close, leaving "la djil." outside the scope of the conjunction. -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.