From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Tue Nov 29 14:32:48 1994
Message-Id: <199411291932.AA15955@nfs1.digex.net>
Date: Tue Nov 29 14:32:48 1994
From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: lo + opaque
Status: RO

> I thought you'd dropped "xehe" in favour of "lohe".
> ---
> And
>

I said I wouldn't mind too much if xe'e is not accepted, because
lo'e can do most of its job, but xe'e is a bit more flexible,
mainly because it can also be used with the mass articles.

Jorge