Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rB4Bb-00007EC; Fri, 25 Nov 94 19:11 EET
Message-Id: <m0rB4Bb-00007EC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 1104; Fri, 25 Nov 94 19:12:05 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 1101; Fri, 25 Nov 1994 19:12:04 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1588; Fri, 25 Nov 1994 18:08:50 +0100
Date:         Thu, 24 Nov 1994 15:57:22 EST
Reply-To:     jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      some outstanding issues
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Content-Length: 357
Lines: 12

What was the final decision on the following issues (if there was one)?

1- {re'u} as the ordinal ROI.

2- A rafsi for {jai}.  Since all SE have rafsi, and {jai} is very much
   like a SE, I think it could use one too. jaz seems to be available.

3- Was {xruti} deagentized? The concensus seemed to be in favour, but
   I'm not sure if it was done.


Jorge