Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0r5isx-00005XC; Fri, 11 Nov 94 01:26 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 2141; Fri, 11 Nov 94 01:26:43 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2137; Fri, 11 Nov 1994 01:26:42 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9970; Fri, 11 Nov 1994 00:23:29 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 18:12:40 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: "le re loi tanxe" To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Content-Length: 477 Lines: 9 Jorge admits that "re loi tanxe" is meaningless ("two masses consisting of all boxes") but argues for "le re loi tanxe", as in "piro loi blanu tanxe" plus "piro loi xunre tanxe". This won't work, because "loi blanu tanxe" isn't "loi tanxe", but "lei tanxe"; there is an in-mind restriction to blue boxes only. This gives "le re lei tanxe" which is fine. -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.