Message-Id: <199411121738.AA21777@nfs1.digex.net>
From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Date: Sat Nov 12 12:38:23 1994
Subject:      Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Sat Nov 12 12:38:23 1994
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

> Jorge:
> > I don't know about "seek", but "look for" doesn't have to involve an
> > abstraction. "I am looking for my book" is perfectly transparent, and
> > I don't see why {sisku} can't be used for it.
>
> "There is a book belonging to me, and I am trying to find it."
> ----
> And

I don't understand. Are you agreeing or disagreeing? Your sentence doesn't
involve opacity either.

Do you agree that I can say {mi sisku le mi cukta}, where {le mi cukta}
is not a property but an object?

Jorge