From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
Message-Id: <199411102301.AA19532@access2.digex.net>
Subject: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 18:01:57 -0500 (EST)
Cc: lojbab@access.digex.net (Logical Language Group)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length:        461
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Nov 10 18:02:27 1994
X-From-Space-Address: lojbab

A note:  "re lo'e nanmu" doesn't mean "two typical men", it means "two
instances of the abstraction called 'the typical man'" and is semantically
unsound, since there is only one such objective abstraction.  (If it isn't
objective, then "le'e" is wanted, and "re le'e nanmu" is fine.)

The semantic unsoundness is similar to that of "re li vo", "two number fours".

-- 
John Cowan		sharing account <lojbab@access.digex.net> for now
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.