Message-Id: <199411291931.AA15894@nfs1.digex.net>
From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Date: Tue Nov 29 14:31:29 1994
Subject:      Re: diversity
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Tue Nov 29 14:31:29 1994
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

> > You disagree that {lo'e} is +opaque then?
>
> I reckon so. For me it's a constant; there is only one lohe broda.

That seems reasonable, two different points of view. Thought as a reference
to brodas, I like to call it an opaque reference. Thought as a reference to
something else, I agree that it's a constant, whose referent is not a broda.

In either case, I find it is useful in translating what in English appear
as opaque contexts, such as "I need a box".

> ---
> And

Jorge