Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rCUzN-00007EC; Tue, 29 Nov 94 18:01 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 2874; Tue, 29 Nov 94 18:01:22 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2871; Tue, 29 Nov 1994 18:01:20 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6631; Tue, 29 Nov 1994 16:58:00 +0100 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 1994 16:41:54 EST Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: lo + opaque X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 262 Lines: 10 > I thought you'd dropped "xehe" in favour of "lohe". > --- > And > I said I wouldn't mind too much if xe'e is not accepted, because lo'e can do most of its job, but xe'e is a bit more flexible, mainly because it can also be used with the mass articles. Jorge