Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0r3s4T-00005bC; Sat, 5 Nov 94 22:50 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9635; Sat, 05 Nov 94 22:50:57 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 9632; Sat, 5 Nov 1994 22:50:56 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6425; Sat, 5 Nov 1994 21:47:50 +0100 Date: Sat, 5 Nov 1994 20:49:53 +0000 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: Re: veridicality trivial? X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: (Your message of Sat, 05 Nov 94 11:07:29 EST.) Content-Length: 994 Lines: 32 Bob Chassell: > jorge@phyast.pitt.edu cuska di'e > > > In Lojban, an imperative is true iff the command is carried out. > > Is that true? I thought imperatives didn't have truth values. > > This is a fundamental misunderstanding of Loglan. *Every* predication > is considered true or false. This is fundamental to the language. > > In a context where `the' is the appropriate translation for {lo}: > > ko ciska lo plipe > > Means "make it be true that `you eat the apple'" > > So the question is, is the following utterance true? > > do ciska lo plipe > > If you do not eat the apple, it is false. It can only be true if you > do eat the apple. Hence, the imperative is true if and only if the > command is carried out. This seems to contradict what pc recently said. I can't remember his exact terms, but it was something like that imperatives have "satisfaction conditions" rather than "truth conditions". What are the truth conditions for Lojban wh-questions? --- And