Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rBlwV-00007EC; Sun, 27 Nov 94 17:55 EET
Message-Id: <m0rBlwV-00007EC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 2677; Sun, 27 Nov 94 17:55:24 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2675; Sun, 27 Nov 1994 17:55:23 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6741; Sun, 27 Nov 1994 16:52:10 +0100
Date:         Sun, 27 Nov 1994 10:52:56 -0500
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: some outstanding issues
X-To:         jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 446
Lines: 10

Final decision?  Who is making any decisions on anuything these days???

There will be no decision on ordinal ROI till pc and Nick have commented.
(Nick earned a vote in everything by his fluent speech last summer).

There have been no changes to the gismu list since the version posted at the
time of the dictionary.  (This includes rafsi).  If your proposals did not go
in before then, they are possible still, but only with prejudice.

lojbab