Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs2.digex.net with SMTP id AA09015 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for ); Sun, 27 Nov 1994 07:32:00 -0500 Message-Id: <199411271232.AA09015@nfs2.digex.net> Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1455; Sun, 27 Nov 94 07:33:00 EST Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6961; Sun, 27 Nov 1994 07:33:00 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Nov 1994 12:30:50 +0000 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: more on lehe & ka X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Bob LeChevalier Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Sun Nov 27 07:32:01 1994 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu There is a controversial but widely accepted distinction between "defining" and "nondefining" features of a category. Taking the familiar example of "bachelor", "She's a regular bachelor" means she possesses the nondefining but not necessarily the defining properties of bachelorhood, e.g. has no significant other, endeavours to be sexually promiscuous, never does any housework, etc etc. "Technically he's a bachelor, but ..." means he has the defining properties of bachelorhood (male & unmarried) but not necessarily the nondefining ones. I have been wondering whether the intention behind "ka" is that it picks out defining properties, and behind "lehe" is that it picks out nondefining properties. "lohe", perhaps, is supposed to pick out both. --- And