Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0r77C8-00005bC; Mon, 14 Nov 94 21:36 EET
Message-Id: <m0r77C8-00005bC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 5919; Mon, 14 Nov 94 21:36:17 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 5916; Mon, 14 Nov 1994 21:36:16 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2191; Mon, 14 Nov 1994 20:33:03 +0100
Date:         Mon, 14 Nov 1994 13:03:58 -0500
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
In-Reply-To:  <199411111334.AA25924@nfs2.digex.net> from
              "i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk" at Nov 11, 94 12:55:18 pm
Content-Length: 403
Lines: 13

la .i,n. cusku di'e

> Well, we need some way of saying "two typical men".  Does {lo'e re nanmu}
> work?

No, I don't think so: since "lo'e" belongs to the "lo"/"loi"/"lo'i" series,
inner quantifiers say how many members the set has.

I think you want "re nanmu cnano" or the like.

--
John Cowan              sharing account <lojbab@access.digex.net> for now
                e'osai ko sarji la lojban.